Pride will be the first thing to destroy everything. Those who control user benchmark does not and is just straight up discriminating against what they don't want to be a successor. One year I loved AMD, the next it was Intel, one year I loved Nvidia the next it was Radeon. I never stuck with a brand because they had something better in the past. I been building computers and have always gone with what performs best for gaming since 2003.
They are false and I don't trust their manipulative ratings on GPUs and CPUs what so ever. I'm finding they gave me false results and information and now I wish I had gotten a Radeon.
I used them and made a big decision on an expensive GPU and got an Nvidia card. They do nothing but down play and show low results for for AMD/Radeon CPU/GPU results. But it's very noticeable today that whoever runs it is either a HUGE Intel/Nvidia fan or advertising for them. and FYI we had an excellent turnout for this comp once the haters stopped whining.Īll ideas welcome, don't be afraid to be critical or offer your own opinion about how we can do this better.User bench mark was a web site I use to go to because it use to be based off current hardware performance that was published by the common user. So we can do it like this or switch things up a bit, it's all about what the members here want to do.Īll I am saying is we don't have to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
#User benchmark free
And please, feel free to assess my leaderboard and tell us if you have an idea or a better way to assess your results. I am going to show you the leaderboard so you can see the details on how I am assessing your submissions. Once all the naysayers stopped posting, and after I lost all credibility for hosting it (lol) we actually had a very successful UBM competition at techpowerup last year. Bottom line? Until you see the value in this benchmark, you will be forever stuck on that perpetual hamster wheel, repeating the same negative lines over and over and over again, sounding like a broken record while at the same time, desperately fighting to change someone else's benchmark competition because it doesnt meet your standards of "purity". I see the benchmark engine as a tool for measuring or estimating system performance under specific circumstances and If you are not ambitious enough to see a potential usage case here then I suppose there is no way to out reason your conclusions. I am not "raving" about nor am I being a "sold out fanboy" who can do no wrong - I'm merely indifferent to the rumors/delusions leveled against because I see it much differently than you do. I am not in love with userbenchmark, nor do they sponsor me. This means your results against like hardware will be legitimate. An accurate and legitimate comparison can then be drawn against your competition. Since we all play by the same rules and all run the same UBM bench engine, your result can confidently be measured against the competition with NO doubts that the benchmark itself is skewing results. That being said, there will ALSO be room to compare member to member results as well, if we get enough interest. gtx 970 specs, gainward geforce gtx 1070 ti, his rx 480, msi geforce gtx 1080 ti. Meaning you will not specifically be competing against other members here at, more, you will be competing against similar hardware benchmarks submitted to UBM. Shop the cheapest selection of gpu userbenchmark, 60 Discount Last 5 Days.
Essentially, you will be competing against all other submissions in the UBM database. Meaning, we will see a fairly accurate depiction of how your hardware performs against the UBM database. In other words, we are dealing with a very large sample size, regardless of whatever hardware you have. The results pool from is very extensive. Reason being, is it's a very quick benchmark but also tests a much broader range of hardware than most benchmark engines. the real question is do you think we can still find a way to make this benchmark viable for competition? We know that many think it's a controversial benchmark. But please, I just said it, so it doesn't need to be re-hashed again and again. I know enough to know that the majority of the computing enthusiasts out there detest this benchmark and claim massive bias and rigged results designed to get you to buy certain hardware based on one or two YouTube videos that are always re-posted whenever someone brings up the subject of UBM as evidence of bias. Forgive the 500 page book I've written below.
0 kommentar(er)
